WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bloomin Brands has a net margin of -9.5% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 0.67%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -11% beat Bloomin Brands's return on equity of -1.6%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $115.03, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Bloomin Brands has an analysts' consensus of $14.58 which suggests that it could grow by 13.14%. Given that Bloomin Brands has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Bloomin Brands is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bloomin Brands has a beta of 1.972, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.179%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Bloomin Brands offers a yield of 7.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomin Brands pays out 33.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Bloomin Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Bloomin Brands quarterly revenues of $1B. Whirlpool's net income of -$393M is lower than Bloomin Brands's net income of $6.9M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Bloomin Brands's PE ratio is 67.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 0.25x for Bloomin Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -9.5% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 9.17%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -11% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $115.03, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $324.10 which suggests that it could fall by -19.03%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Whirlpool's net income of -$393M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Tesla's PE ratio is 196.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 14.33x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of -9.5% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 8.86%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -11% beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 65.49%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $115.03, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $18.83 which suggests that it could grow by 26.46%. Given that The Wendy's has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe The Wendy's is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.919%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 6.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 102.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $566.7M. Whirlpool's net income of -$393M is lower than The Wendy's's net income of $50.2M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 1.39x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of -9.5% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 5.36%. Whirlpool's return on equity of -11% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $115.03, signalling upside risk potential of 5.89%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $25.44 which suggests that it could grow by 6.11%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.638% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.883, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.326%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Whirlpool's net income of -$393M is lower than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.36x versus 1.07x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.